LG Configuration | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Figures of Merit | Weight | Single Main | Taildragger | Quadricycle | Bicycle | Tricycle |
Stability | 0.2 | -1 | -2 | -1 | 1 | 2 |
Ground Clearance | 0.3 | -2 | 1 | -1 | -1 | 2 |
Manufacturing Difficulty | 0.2 | 1 | 1 | -1 | 0 | 2 |
Manufacturing Experience | 0.1 | -1 | 0 | -2 | -2 | 2 |
Simplicity | 0.2 | 0 | 1 | -1 | -1 | 1 |
Final Scoring | 1 | -0.7 | 0.3 | -1.1 | -0.5 | 1.8 |
The decision matrix shows different considerations for LG configurations and the tricycle has the largest score with the tail dragger in second place. Tricycle landing gear will be selected due to the increased ground clearance for the X-1 test vehicle and the mission requirements. This configuration also has increased stability and manufacturing experience/analysis.
After viewing past top designs for the last 8 years, almost all have the same implementation of NLG
A simple design that just has a steel rod/wire attached to a connecting part with the wheel, will be similar to what was being designed for the trainer plane.
Almost all past aircraft in AIAA DBF winning reports do not incorporate nose wheel steering
With no NLG steering, the NLG attachment can be just a simple attachment to either the fuselage itself or a reinforced plate depending on the spacing of the nose portion of the aircraft